Skip to content

Transmission tables with attenuator  #1

Description

@grazwegian

What do you think would be the best way to handle the transmission when the attenuator is in? Currently we have a per detector file stix_transmission_highres_20210303.csv which does not include attenuation and a component file which includes the transmission through the attenuator stix_transmission_by_component_highres_20210303.csv. The information here can be combined during processing when the attenuator is in but this might not be the cleanest way to handle it.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions